Washington Post – Skunk Politics

July 31, 2018August 17, 2018

THE WASHING POST CREATES A TESTAMENT TO THE MEDIA’S ANTI-TRUMP BIAS

The US media outlets continuously attempt to outdo each other in their quest to publicly skewer the President. They persist in re-imagining actual events to fit their four or five persistent narratives meant to belittle Trump. One narrative they have fallen in love with is that Trump is an unprecedented-liar. And one herculean effort to hoodwink the American people into believing this false narrative was concocted by the Washington Post (WAPO.) They created an abortion of truth in the form of an interactive, graphical, updating, accumulation of 4,229 (and counting) falsehoods or misleading claims made by the President. The crown jewel of modern day fact-checking.

In the Washington Post’s attempt to create a history of Trump lies, they have inadvertently created a historical testament to the bias of their own paper. I believe that in the near future, this WAPO creation will be studied in schools as young students marvel with open mouths at the audacity of the journalistic bias prevalent during the Trump era. In fact, the piece is so light on actual lies, you will note that they add the term “or misleading claims” into the title so they can lump opposing opinions in with the alleged lies. How do they get away with it? Ask CNN’s Brian Stelter, Brooke Baldwin or Jake Tapper, or the swarms of journalists who only read this project’s headline (above) and then irresponsibly proclaim that Trump spewed four thousand lies on their cable news shows or in their tabloids, solely based on the headline.

Let’s examine the first batch of the Washington Post’s findings to see how the Post bastardized the fact-check:

Trump said “collusion is not a crime” which is true. WAPO claims Trump is playing word games because something else, that is not “collusion,” is a crime. Huh? Who is playing word games, Trump? This is insanity and WAPO should be thankful no one actually reads past the headline of this mockery of journalism. PS, paying Christopher Steele to buy Russian intelligence from Russian agents is kind of, sort of, possibly, likely collusion, sorry Hillary.

Trump stated he didn’t need the Koch brothers support, which he did not get. WAPO is claiming… the Koch’s support for Republican senators “likely” had an overall positive effect on Trump. This assertion is the Post’s opinion, not a fact. In reality, the Koch’s did many things to impede Trump’s success as well. Additionally, WAPO relies on the fact the no one will read the Politico article they linked because in no way did the article affirm that Trump sought the Koch’s support, it claimed someone from Trump’s campaign filled out a questionnaire, lol.

This particular fact check by WAPO defies human logic. They wrote a sentence that has nothing to do with what Trump said. Where did Trump say anything about the ratio of people crossing the border into/out of America? They should fire the intern who wrote that one.

The three lies I linked were not anomalies. I chose the first three lies written on the first topic. Journalism is dead.

May 28, 2017May 30, 2017

Debunking the Press Lies About Back Channel Communications

The practice of maintaining back channel communications with adversarial nations goes back a long way, and a short way. These bridges serve as important and necessary tools of our nations diplomacy. The United States and the U.S.S.R. were on the brink of a nuclear holocaust in 1962 until cooler heads prevailed via back channels. (See photo above) If that crisis took place today with Trump as president, our media would have preferred a few hundred thousand crispy corpses.

President Obama’s administration negotiated the timing of a four hundred million dollar cash payment to Iran, in exchange for American prisoners. The deal was entirely concocted via a back channel. Iran does not have diplomatic relations with the U.S. and like most adversaries requires these alternate means of communiqué.

The generic response to this rebuttal of the back-channel-scandal, entails acquiescence to the need for communications such as these but an unwillingness to stretch that need to cover an incumbent President. This is not the original thesis of the critique but it is a more credible criticism. Unfortunately, it’s based on speculation. All agree there can only be one President at a time and only one policy. However, nothing indicates that Kushner violated this doctrine. No evidence exists to suggest he engaged in any direct negotiations or policy discussion with the Russians. It is plausible that the Trump team was establishing a relationship to deal with Syria and other pressing matters in preparation for when they took office.

The tragedy once again lies within our press corp that is oozing Trump-hate from their pores. Their continuing mission is to fool the public, on a daily basis, into believing something unprecedented is happening under this President. The reporters wrote these headlines with full knowledge of how back channels work. In fact, buried many paragraphs into the propaganda, the authors of the fairy tale inspired articles admit the truth about how communications with adversaries are conducted. But the goal is to hoodwink the public, and a headline is clearly enough to get the fake narrative across.

May 23, 2017May 24, 2017

Da Deep State Don’t Stop

Sources who happen to hate the president gone wild

Sources: TRUMP ASKED DNI, NSA TO DENY EVIDENCE OF RUSSIA COLLUSION

Bullshit.
The rebelling deep-state’s playbook, detailed here, is once again on display. The Washington Post took a half truth out of context, and mixed in some innuendo and presto, fake-news that other outlets repeated and expanded upon throughout the political media. Why wouldn’t they when the source is a card-carrying member of the intelligence agencies.

Maybe Trump told the DNI and the NSA that this investigation is damaging the country and if there is nothing there, then they should expose the falsehood to the people.

Alas, the rogue intelligence agencies are on a relentless warpath to hang Trump so they intentionally misconstrued the truth and the Washington Post ate it up. There was no other side to the story. Did they ask a follow-up question? Were there any transcripts to examine? All the Post got or wanted was one measly sentence that made Trump look like a crook.

UPDATE: The above speculation offered here, is exactly what happened. Trump asked the DNI, NSA chiefs to publicly deny it IF they knew it was untrue. This is conveniently buried.

May 18, 2017May 29, 2017

The Deep State Playbook

The combination of a compromised press and our corrupted intelligence bureaus is ominous. Most folks accept the premise that most of our news media hates the current president, to the core. It likewise becomes clearer each day (see video) how the intelligence community feels about the president. Trump-hysteria infects the heart which clouds the mind leaving no one immune.

The Washington Post and CNN will eagerly accept and publish anything that demeans Trump, provided it comes from a ‘reliable source.’ They are not going to investigate the other side of the story and they damn sure don’t fully question their prized sources to obtain a complete narrative. But they do require a legitimate source, they don’t make shit up. This lone criteria in our current climate created a perfect game plan for the deep state (our intelligentsia) who are themselves per se an unending fountain of reliable sources. Here is an imagined example of how it works;

After high level meetings with adversaries, like Russia, our CIA reviews every detail of the meeting for any data to glean. CIA agents and technology detect countless nuggets of information to examine. We can assume presidential meetings receive more than a once-over. We can also assume defensive reviews take place to ensure our side did not give something away to the adversary. If there is a suspicion that something passed from either side, there is further review. This is where the chicanery comes in.

Let us pretend there is a routine call for a review of something Trump said that is potentially sensitive data. Regardless of the outcome of said review, a corrupt source tells a CNN stooge that they can confirm “there is concern Trump may have disclosed sensitive data to the Russians.” This is not a lie, it’s a little exaggeration and cherry picking of facts, but when CNN finishes the evening news, there are calls for impeachment. CNN has mastered the art of laundering innuendo into facts to make it suitable for endless repetition. The best part, no one can dispute classified information.

The basic cycle of intelligence agents illegally leaking half-truths to the gung-ho corrupt press repeats until the president falls.