The Anatomy of a CNN Headline

Vague Innuendo

Let us examine the game CNN plays with the minds of their audience.

SOURCES: RUSSIANS DISCUSSED POTENTIALLY “DEROGATORY” INFORMATION ABOUT TRUMP & ASSOCIATES DURING CAMPAIGN

CNN’s hope is that people in the doctor’s office look up from their magazines at the TV and see “Russia” and “Trump” in the same headline. This reinforces the Trump-Russia tale they’ve been peddling uninterrupted for months. For those at home, who actually watch the network, the anchors will jabber on for hours adding no other information outside the purposefully vague headline.

My theory, like the Deceleration of Independence, is self-evident. The entirety of the story derives from one (confirmed) source who cherry picked a factoid in which key points are intentionally withheld by the source, so as not to diminish the Trump-Russia narrative. But CNN is adept at laundering  any anti-trump dribble into A-block news. Question time:

  1. Was this type of spy chatter common in the past as well? The fact that this is an actual story implies that this is  a new phenomenon for Donald J. Trump. Isn’t this what Russian spies have always done?
  2. What is this “derogatory information?” What would motivate a source to leave out this key fact which is the crux of the issue?
  3. “Russians” Can you be more specific? American spies intercept boatloads of Russian spy communications. Is this from some low-level nobody on Facebook or a (i.e.) senior FSB official, they must know.
  4. “Discussed?” If they intercepted the conversation, tell us what they were saying. Was it a plan? Why do we get 1/10th of a story?
  5. “Potentially” This is a qualifier denoting the whole story is quite possibly  bogus. The most crucial word in the headline.

Regardless, this story is smoke not fire and will dissipate as such. No one will follow it up because no one cares, it’s as impactful as the golf channel to an eight year old on the way to his cartoons.

For more on CNN’s  “sources” trick see here.

Share:

Da Deep State Don’t Stop

Sources who happen to hate the president gone wild

Sources: TRUMP ASKED DNI, NSA TO DENY EVIDENCE OF RUSSIA COLLUSION

Bullshit.
The rebelling deep-state’s playbook, detailed here, is once again on display. The Washington Post took a half truth out of context, and mixed in some innuendo and presto, fake-news that other outlets repeated and expanded upon throughout the political media. Why wouldn’t they when the source is a card-carrying member of the intelligence agencies.

Maybe Trump told the DNI and the NSA that this investigation is damaging the country and if there is nothing there, then they should expose the falsehood to the people.

Alas, the rogue intelligence agencies are on a relentless warpath to hang Trump so they intentionally misconstrued  the truth and the Washington Post ate it up. There was no other side to the story. Did they ask a follow-up question? Were there any transcripts to examine? All the Post got or wanted was one measly sentence that made Trump look like a crook.

UPDATE: The above speculation offered here, is exactly what happened. Trump asked the DNI, NSA chiefs to publicly deny it IF they knew it was untrue. This is conveniently buried.

Share:

The Deep State is Out of Control

The deep state is out of control and neither the media nor the government  care.

Another President At Odds With The Deep State

Is it just me and JFK or do other people see a problem with rogue intelligence agencies having their own agenda?

Share:

The Deep State Playbook

Clapper

The combination of a compromised press and our corrupted intelligence bureaus is ominous. Most folks accept the premise that most of our news media hates the current president, to the core. It likewise becomes clearer each day (see video) how the intelligence community feels about the president. Trump-hysteria infects the heart which clouds the mind leaving no one immune.

Rogers

The Washington Post and CNN will eagerly accept and publish anything that demeans Trump, provided it comes from a ‘reliable source.’ They are not going to investigate the other side of the story and they damn sure don’t fully question their prized sources to obtain a complete narrative. But they do require a legitimate source, they don’t make shit up. This lone criteria in our current climate created a perfect game plan for the deep state (our intelligentsia) who are themselves per se an unending fountain of reliable sources. Here is an imagined example of how it works;

Hayden

After high level meetings with adversaries, like Russia, our CIA reviews every detail of the meeting for any data to glean. CIA agents and technology detect countless nuggets of information to examine. We can assume presidential meetings receive more than a once-over. We can also assume defensive reviews take place to ensure our side did not give something away to the adversary. If there is a suspicion that something passed from either side, there is further review. This is where the chicanery comes in.

Brennan

Let us pretend there is a routine call for a review of something Trump said that is potentially sensitive data. Regardless of the outcome of said review, a corrupt source tells a CNN stooge that they can confirm “there is concern Trump may have disclosed sensitive data to the Russians.” This is not a lie, it’s a little exaggeration and cherry picking of facts, but when CNN finishes the evening news, there are calls for impeachment. CNN has mastered the art of laundering innuendo into facts to make it suitable for endless repetition. The best part, no one can dispute classified information.

The basic cycle of intelligence agents illegally leaking half-truths to the gung-ho corrupt press repeats until the president falls.

Share:

Jake Tapper’s Judgement Clouded

Stay Woke Jake Tapper

The CNN anchor Jake Tapper captured two former heads of the United States intelligence agencies admitting {video below} that they both believe Donald Trump is assaulting our democracy and yet Tapper didn’t ask the most basic follow-up question.

Clapper, ‘I think our institutions are under assault internally’
Tapper, ‘Internally from the President?”
Clapper, “Exactly’
Clapper, ‘I feel as though [checks and balances] is under assault and eroding’
Hayden, ‘As a citizen I totally agree with what Jim {Clapper] told you yesterday’ [said after hearing Clapper’s comments]

Does Tapper comprehend what happens if the leaders of the NSA, CIA and FBI conclude that the President is assaulting democracy? These two former intelligence giants surmised that Trump is impeding the other branches of our government from doing one of their constitutionally assigned duties; keeping the executive in check. Tapper is so happy to have people on his team (Go Hillary) he doesn’t ask the spy duo what they would do about this crisis, or what their replacements are going to do about it. If they feel our very democracy is in jeopardy, then what? Watch it all fall down? Great job Jake. Maybe when the Marines call Trump a Clear and Present Danger you will awake from your slumber. These men are dangerous.

Being alarmist about the alarmists?

Share: